Posts Tagged :

fraud

UK fraud pegged at £570 million in the first half of 2024

Data from UK Finance indicates criminals stole £571.7 million through unauthorised and authorised fraud in the first half of 2024, representing a 1.5 per cent decrease compared to the first half of 2023.

Banks prevented £710.9 million of unauthorised fraud through advanced security systems, while 72 per cent of APP fraud started online and 16 per cent started through telecommunications networks.

Losses due to unauthorised transactions across payment cards, remote banking and cheques were £358 million in the first half of this year, an increase of five per cent. The total number of recorded cases was just over 1.5 million, an increase of 19 per cent.

One of the main reasons for the overall rise in payment card fraud losses was a 26 per cent increase in card not present cases. Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) has helped to reduce fraud by verifying a customer’s identity; however, evidence has shown that criminals have been socially engineering victims to trick them into divulging one-time passcodes to authenticate online transactions. 

Card ID theft cases decreased by 15 per cent with losses down 12 per cent to £29.3 million. 

There was a 13 per cent increase in the amount of unauthorised fraud prevented – up to £710.9 million. Victims of unauthorised fraud cases such as these are legally protected against losses and UK Finance research indicates that customers are fully refunded in more than 98 per cent of these fraud cases.

Ben Donaldson, Managing Director of Economic Crime at UK Finance, said: “Fraud continues to pose a major threat in this country with over £570 million stolen through payment fraud in the first half of the year. In addition to the financial impact, this crime can cause severe psychological harm to victims. 

“This isn’t a fight we will win alone as our data again shows that most fraud originates online and via telecommunications networks. There have been some improvements made by other sectors, but their actions don’t yet fully match the scale of the problem – more needs to be done to prevent fraudsters exploiting these platforms and networks. 

“Earlier this month we saw the introduction of new APP reimbursement rules for customers and while reimbursement is important in the fight against fraud, it can only be part of the solution. On its own it does nothing to prevent or reduce the psychological harms to victims, nor does it prevent organised crime groups from stealing money. That is why the financial services industry is always focused on preventing fraud happening in the first place.

“Criminals will keep adapting, which means we all need to remain focused on reducing fraud and thereby protect customers and society from the adverse effects of this awful crime.”

Dan Holmes, Director of Banking Fraud, Identity & Market Strategy at Feedzai said: “It’s encouraging to see declines in certain fraud categories, in particular APP, thanks in most part to strong investment by banks along with industry collaboration and education programmes. There are gentle changes within the data however to remind us that fraud is adversarial. Increases in unauthorised fraud across multiple channels reminds us that we cannot be complacent. Fraudsters are dynamic, meaning prevention strategies must be too. Continuous innovation and an ability to be agile and adapt quickly remains vital.” 

Authorised push payment (APP) fraud losses were £213.7million, down 11 per cent compared with the first half of last year. This comprised £166.5 million of personal losses and £47.2 million of business losses.

The total number of APP cases was down 16 per cent to 97,344, with falls in case numbers across all categories of APP fraud. 

The number of purchase scams, where a victim pays in advance for goods or services that are never received decreased by 11 per cent. The number of romance scams, where victims are tricked into believing they are in a relationship, fell by seven per cent and investment scams also decreased in cases by 29 per cent. 

The number of fraud cases where criminals impersonate a bank or the police and convince someone to transfer money to a “safe account” fell by 32 per cent and the amount lost to this type of fraud fell by 26 per cent. There has been significant investment made in warning consumers that a bank will never ask someone to transfer money in this way.

In total £126.7 million of APP losses was returned to victims in H1 2024 or 59 per cent of the total loss. New reimbursement rules from the Payment Systems Regulator came into effect on 7 October.

Authorised push payment fraud losses continued to be driven by the abuse of online platforms and telecommunications. Not only do criminals take advantage of these platforms to encourage the transfer of money through investment, romance or purchase scams but criminals also use scam phone calls, text messages and emails to trick people into handing over personal details and passwords.

Typically, criminals first focus their attempts on socially engineering personal information from their victims with a view to committing APP fraud in which the victim makes the payment themselves. If this is not successful, the criminal often has enough personal information to enable them instead to impersonate their victims, with a view to either taking control of their existing accounts or applying for credit cards in their name.

UK Finance data on the sources of APP fraud shows:

  • 72 per cent of APP fraud cases originated from online sources. These cases tend to be lower-value scams, such as purchase scams, and so account for 32 per cent of total losses.
  • 16 per cent of cases originated in telecommunications and these tend to include higher value cases, such as impersonation fraud, and so account for 35 per cent of total losses.
SOURCEVOLUME OF CASESVALUE OF LOSSES
Online72%32%
Telecommunications16%35%
Email1%10%
Other3%6%
Unable to ascertain8%17%
Photo by SumUp on Unsplash

European credit sector associations call for more fraud prevention efforts

The European Credit Sector Associations, composed of the European Association of Cooperative Banks (EACB), the European Banking Federation (EBF), the European Savings and Retail Banking Group (ESBG) have welcomed the publication by the Euro Retail Payments Board (ERPB) of its Working Group Report on fraud related to retail payments.

On top of the three Associations, other key stakeholders from the private and public sector have actively contributed to the Report. It identifies four “gamechanger” actions that are necessary to strengthen the fraud prevention and mitigation across Europe, as well as a set of best practices identified to combat fraud.

Sanne van der Neut, co-Chair of the working group on behalf of the EACB, representing the supply side, said: “This report comes at an important point in time. Fraudsters are getting increasingly inventive and the fraud chain is becoming more complex. Fighting this needs a multistakeholder approach and one that goes beyond the payment sector.” 

The report is the outcome of a collaborative effort that brings together the perspectives and unique insights from a wide range of parties affected by fraud, including representatives from consumer and merchant organisations, bank and non-bank payment service providers, central banks, the European Banking Authority, the European Commission, the European Data Protection Board, and Europol. 

The four “gamechangers” identified for a more effective prevention and mitigation of fraud are:
1) Effective cross-sectoral collaboration beyond the payment industry and shared responsibilities;
2) The sharing of fraud insights and data;
3) A supervisory enforcement and cooperation at EU level across sectors beyond the payment industry;
4) Ensuring that product design prioritises consumer protection.

For each gamechanger, several actions are recommended that EU, national authorities, and the private sector can implement. It is especially noted that these recommendations can be particularly relevant to the work of the European Parliament and the Council, in the context of the ongoing negotiations on the proposal for a Regulation on payment services in the internal market (PSR) and beyond. The conclusions of this cross sectoral collaboration highlight that digital fraud and scams relate to a far broader and more complex matrix than the point of payment alone and should be regulated in a sufficiently comprehensive way outside the auspices of payments regulation.

The paper also includes a list of best practices, intended to serve as a collection of measures that public and private actors can draw upon when combating fraud. 

The ERPB Working Group, launched in May 2023, was prompted by the rise of fraudulent activities accelerated by digitalization and social engineering. This initiative underscores the need for all actors in the fraud chain to collaborate more efficiently in preventing and combating fraud.

Aviva reveals huge spike in car insurance fraud

Aviva reported a 39% increase in the number of claims declined as a result of fraud in 2023, uncovering more than 11,000 suspect claims worth £116m – the equivalent of 30 bogus claims a day with a value of £318,000.

The company says it’s investigating a further 13,100 claims for suspected fraud. Fraudulent motor insurance claims for injury and vehicle damage represented the majority of detected fraud, accounting for two out of three (66%) suspect claims.

Motor injury fraud remains the most popular target for fraudsters, accounting for 35% of all bogus claims Aviva detected. The number of fraudulent injury claims declined for suspected fraud grew by 19% and was worth more than £23m – £6m of which came from declined crash for cash claims.

A large proportion of the injury claims Aviva declined for fraud are opportunistic claims brought by third parties (not Aviva customers) – for example, an exaggerated injury claim stemming from a low-speed accident, such as a shunt in a car park. Aviva defended more than 400 such fraudulent or exaggerated bodily injury claims at trial to limit the impact that these claims can have on customers’ motor premiums.

Fraudulent claims for motor damage rocketed by 123%, as third parties sought to exaggerate and inflate the cost of repair and credit hire claims. As highlighted by Aviva in 2022, organised whiplash fraudsters have refocused their efforts on the repair aspects of a motor claim, including credit hire and repair. Aviva has witnessed particular growth in motor damage fraud after the Whiplash Reforms came into effect in 2021, signaling a shift in focus for organised fraudsters.

Though not technically fraud, the use of ‘spoof ads’ on internet search engines by a small number of unscrupulous claims and accident management companies (CMC / AMC) continues to mislead customers into thinking they are contacting their motor insurer to claim for an accident they’ve had.

The trouble arises when the at-fault insurer challenges the inflated costs presented by the CMC or AMC. The claims company will then pressure the customer into paying, as they will have signed contracts obliging them to pay if the repair, credit hire and other costs can’t be recovered. These costs are frequently in the tens of thousands of pounds. Although this would normally be covered as part of the customer’s insurance policy, because the customer inadvertently (and often unknowingly) claimed via a CMC or AMC, the insurer is both unaware of the claim and unable to help the customer.

To protect customers from the effects of fraud, Aviva continues to invest in its detection capabilities. This has seen Aviva double the number of employees dedicated to investigating fraud, as well as delivering more than 6,000 hours of counter-fraud training for its people.

Aviva identified fraud on more than 51,000 motor policy applications, up 64% on 2022 policy fraud detection figures. The sharp increase reflects the continual training and investment that Aviva has made in its policy fraud detection capabilities. By keeping known fraudsters off its books, Aviva is able to protect customers from the worst effects of policy fraud, ensuring its genuine customers don’t pay for the actions of fraudsters.

These figures also include policies sold by unregulated third parties, known as ‘ghost brokers’. Ghost brokers act as an insurance intermediary and purchase insurance policies using false or misleading information about the customer to acquire cheaper insurance. Ghost brokers will then frequently alter the insurance ‘policy’ before sharing with their ‘customer’ to show ‘proof’ of their insurance purchase. However, the insurance policy is all but worthless, as the ghost broker obtains the policy through lying and misrepresenting the identity and/or nature of the risk being insured (such as address, age of driver, etc.). 

The result is that the ‘policyholder’ directly compensates the fraudster for a worthless policy, meaning they are driving without valid insurance which is not only illegal, but also carries all of the associated risks of driving uninsured.

The next largest area for fraudulent claims is in liability, such as bogus slips and trips. Fraudulent claims for liability represent 23% of all fraudulent claims detected by Aviva. Despite the number of fraudulent liability claims remaining flat, the value of these claims has grown by 9% year-on-year, highlighting the importance of detection in this area.

Household fraud accounted for 6% of detected fraud and was primarily comprised of claims for valuable items. The most popular items that were fraudulently claimed for were:

  1. Jewellery/rings
  2. Mobile phones
  3. TV’s
  4. Laptops
  5. Tablets

Pete Ward, Head of Claims Counter Fraud at Aviva, said, “We’re here to help our customers when something’s gone wrong, settling their claim quickly and fairly. But where we detect fraud, we will vigorously defend fraudulent or inflated claims and, where appropriate, prosecute those who target Aviva.

“That’s why we’ve invested in the tools, technology and people necessary to create a robust counter-fraud capability, helping to ensure the cost of insurance fraud is not passed onto our customers. This investment has improved our ability to detect fraud across all lines of business and has contributed to the steep rise in the number of fraudulent claims we detected last year – particularly in motor, where exaggerated claims for damage have rocketed.

“Last year also saw Aviva, working with IFED, secure the industry’s first Serious Crime Prevention Order against Hamed Sediqi, who repeatedly targeted Aviva in an organised motor fraud campaign. This is a landmark result against a serial fraudster which will not only protect Aviva and its customers from being targeted, but should also act as a wake-up call to other professional fraudsters about the consequences of their actions. Combined with our recent successful application of the Proceeds of Crime Act, Aviva continues not only to detect fraud, but also create powerful deterrents against committing insurance fraud in the first place.”

Photo by Yeka.UK on Unsplash

Visa highlights AI threat in latest data

Visa’s latest Biannual Threats Report highlights a ‘significant’ rise of phishing schemes proliferated through generative AI tools, and a marked increase in enumeration and ransomware. While the global fraud rate trended lower than normal expected fraud levels during the report’s time period (January – June 2023), Visa shared that it helped to proactively block $30 billion in those time periods.

However, threat actors were successful in conducting targeted and sophisticated fraud schemes impacting specific institutions, technology, and processes.

Highlights of the report’s findings include:

  • Ransomware attacks continue to evolve and grow in prevalence. March 2023 surpassed prior ransomware attack records for the most attacks in one month with nearly 460 attacks; a 91% increase over February 2023 numbers and 62% higher compared to the same period in 2022. A 2023 ransomware report identified that exploited vulnerabilities were the most common (36%) root cause of ransomware attacks, followed by compromised credentials (29%). Interestingly, ransomware attacks and related threat actors do not always target payment data specifically but will compromise any data accessible during their attacks including payment data or personal identifiable information.
  • Enumeration attacks continue to impact merchants and consumers alike. The period covered in this study saw a 40% increase in enumeration attacks over the previous six months. Visa used its Visa Account Attack Intelligence to identify these attacks in real time to alert merchants and stop fraud in its tracks.
  • Card-Not-Present merchants emerge as bigger target. Online merchants were responsible for 58% of total fraud and breach investigations, while brick and mortar merchants made up 20%, and ransomware/fraud scheme made up 7%.

Retail-specific schemes saw a measurable uptick during the past six months, including:

  • False, spoofed, or counterfeit merchants: Consumers are being targeted through websites that seem like their favorite merchants. These sites are established to take customers’ orders but do not fulfill the goods or services ordered and instead steal customers’ payment account information.
  • The rise of malvertising: Some scammers are developing fake ads to try to garner personal information. Victims of these schemes are targeted with search engine-optimized scams that prey on what they might be interested in legitimately purchasing.
  • Flash-fraud scams: Flash fraud merchants, also known as bust-out schemes, which is when threat actors establish a legitimate merchant and process a small number of legitimate payments to establish credibility, are also on the rise. Once a satisfactory payment processing history is established, the seller suddenly submits a large number of fraudulent transactions—often using stolen payment account data – and quickly disappears after they obtain the funds from the stolen accounts.
  • Free gift scams: An emerging crypto scam in the retail space is the “free gift” scam, where bad actors offer a “free gift” through a pop-up window asking the victim to confirm the transaction. When clicked, the malicious payload is executed, which includes a file with malicious NFT, allowing fraudsters to communicate with the victim’s wallet and authorize cryptocurrency transfers from the victim’s wallet to the fraudster’s.

“While we are pleased by the lower-than-expected fraud rate over the last few months, this edition of the Biannual Threats Report continues to underscore just how savvy fraudsters continue to be,” said Paul Fabara, Chief Risk Officer at Visa. “The same way criminals take advantage of technology advances, so does Visa, and the $30 billion of fraud prevented in the last six months alone is a great testament to that.”

While the threat landscape is more complicated than ever, consumers can take solace in the ways Visa is working to protect them. Visa Payment Fraud Disruption’s efforts over the past six months have resulted in significant crackdowns on cybercrime activities with help from global law enforcement and government agencies.

Visa says it also helped bring fraudsters to justice around the world. In May 2023, the US Secret Service took down a major cybercrime platform called Try2Check. Its administrator, Denis Gennadievich Kulkov, faces 20 years in prison. A local enforcement action called Operation Urban Justice was launched in California targeting Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) fraud, which led to the arrest of 20 suspects believed to be part of an Eastern European crime syndicate. In April 2023, an international law enforcement coalition led the Genesis Market Takedown, arresting 119 people involved with the cybercrime platform.

Image by hartono subagio from Pixabay

Fraud risk trends to watch out for in 2023

Various types of fraud pose significant risks to UK businesses, including financial loss, reputational damage, legal consequences, regulatory non-compliance, and loss of customer trust. Fraudulent activities can also lead to direct monetary losses through theft, embezzlement, or fraudulent transactions. 

The reputation of a business can be severely affected, impacting customer perception and relationships with partners and stakeholders. 

Legal consequences and regulatory penalties may also arise from non-compliance with fraud prevention regulations. Additionally, fraud erodes customer trust, potentially leading to decreased sales and a damaged brand image.

Being informed allows businesses to proactively address vulnerabilities, demonstrate commitment to security, and mitigate the potential damage caused by fraudulent activities.

Here are seven of the top fraud risk trends to watch out for in 2023, couyrtesy of Yves Laffont, Sector Lead, Financial Crime at  FDM Group:-

  1. Cybersecurity breaches are on the rise

The Cyber Security Breaches Survey reveals that a total of 11% of businesses have experienced cyber crime in the last 10 months, which includes 26% of medium businesses and 37% of large businesses. It is estimated that there have been 2.39 million instances of cyber crime and approximately 49,000 instances of fraud as a result of cyber crime within this time period. With each instance of cyber crime estimated to cost a business £15,300 per victim per year, the cost of cybersecurity breaches can be hefty. The rising frequency of cyberattacks means that tackling cyber threats should be a high priority for medium and large businesses in particular.

  1. Deepfake technology fuelled by AI advancements

Deepfake technology derives from the terms ‘deep learning’ and ‘fake’, referring to the use of AI to create realistic fake audio, video, or images. It can be used to impersonate people and aid malicious individuals in identity theft. Deepfake technology can even simulate speech, actions, and emotions, and can be quite convincing!

While deepfakes are becoming increasingly prevalent across social media apps, deepfake technology can also be used to defraud businesses by convincing an employee to compromise sensitive information, release funds, or engage in fraudulent transactions. 

  1. Synthetic identity theft is increasingly difficult to detect

Synthetic identity theft typically combines both legitimate components, such as real addresses, and fabricated information, which can make it extremely challenging to detect and prevent. Moreover, since the fraudulent identities have no prior credit history or suspicious activities associated with them, they can evade traditional fraud detection systems that rely on historical data patterns.

  1. Account takeover fraud has grown by 350% YOY

An account takeover (ATO) refers to when a criminal gains access to a real consumer account, such as a social media, email, or bank account, which will typically be done using stolen information. Account takeover fraud increased by 250% year-on-year in 2020, with financial services firms witnessing 72% of all these attacks. Similarly, in 2021, 20% of data breaches were attributed to account takeovers, totalling over $5.1 billion for consumers and businesses. This emphasises the importance for financial institutions to take proactive measures to protect their customers, and serves as a reminder to other industries that account takeovers are a serious threat they may encounter and must be wary of. 

  1. Businesses are more susceptible to card-not-present (CNP) fraud risk liability

Card-not-present fraud (CNP) occurs when consumers pay for goods and services online, by telephone or by mail, where a card is not presented to the merchant physically for verification. When a cardholder’s billing information is compromised or stolen, an unauthorised individual may use their card to make purchases. Unfortunately, with the rise of e-commerce and consumers still demanding quick ways to purchase products, fraudsters are provided with ample opportunities to exploit vulnerabilities in online payment systems, manipulate checkout processes, or use stolen card information to make fraudulent purchases.

  1. Insider threats pose a high fraud risk

While organisations must be vigilant of external threats, insider threats have also risen by 44% in the past few years. Insider threats can occur from the actions of either current employees, former employees, customers, or suppliers – either through malicious intent or negligence. Employees with privileged access typically pose the highest fraud risk for your business.

In many cases, insider threats are motivated by money, competitive advantages, and revenge. For example, 45% of employees download, save, or send work documents to their personal accounts after leaving a job in order to impress their new employers. The sharing of company contracts, spreadsheets, or customer information can pose a serious risk for all parties involved.

  1. Social engineering attacks in an age of remote working

Social engineering is not a direct cyber attack but, instead, involves using human psychology to persuade individuals to put their guard down and partake in unsafe activities, such as handing over sensitive information or clicking a malicious website link. Phishing is one of the most common forms of social engineering where fraudsters impersonate legitimate entities, such as banks, government agencies, or trusted organisations, to trick individuals into providing their personal information, such as passwords or credit card details.

Living in an age of remote working, social engineering attacks are increasing. A study shows that 9 out of 10 respondents state that the threat landscape has worsened, and 75% say remote working has contributed to this. Social engineering attackers have been capitalising on the frequent online communication with online messaging and emails being the primary form of organisational comms.

Image by Alexa from Pixabay

Demand for fraud detection solutions to drive market to $252bn

The fraud detection and prevention industry generated $29.5 billion in 2022, and is anticipated to hit 252.7 billion by 2032, equivalent to a CAGR of 24.3% over the forecast period.

Analysis by Allied Market Research cites the introduction of big data analytics and cloud computing service, plus an upsurge in mobile payments, to bolster the growth of the market.

However, it adds that the high cost of fraud detection and prevention solutions is likely to restrict the pace of growth in some markets.

Based on component, the solution segment held the highest market share in 2022, accounting for nearly two-thirds of the fraud detection and prevention market revenue and is estimated to maintain its leadership status throughout the forecast period.

The growing instances of security breaches and cyber-attacks drive the segment growth. However, the service segment is projected to manifest the highest CAGR of 28.0% from 2023 to 2032. This is because fraud detection and prevention services help reduce the time and costs associated with optimizing systems in the initial phase of deployment.

Based on deployment mode, the on-premises segment accounted for the largest share in 2022, contributing to more than three-fifths of global fraud detection and prevention market revenue. This is because on-premises applications offer many benefits in terms of security, flexibility, and customization.

However, the cloud segment is expected to portray the fastest CAGR of 28.0% from 2023 to 2032 and is projected to maintain its lead position during the forecast period. Growth in the adoption of cloud-based fraud detection and prevention solutions among large and medium-sized enterprises mainly drives the growth of the segment.

Based on organization size, the large enterprises segment held the highest market share in 2022, accounting for nearly two-thirds of the fraud detection and prevention market revenue and is estimated to maintain its leadership status throughout the forecast period.

There is an increase in the adoption of fraud detection and prevention in large enterprises, owing to the rise in complexity, cyber risks, and threats in business processes, which leads to high competition across industries. However, the small and medium-sized enterprises segment is projected to manifest the highest CAGR of 28.6% from 2023 to 2032. The need to implement cost-effective security solutions such as encryption, risk & compliance, and incident management drives the adoption of fraud detection and prevention solutions in SME’s.

Based on region, North America held the highest market share in terms of revenue in 2022, accounting for more than one-third of the global fraud detection and prevention market revenue. However, the Asia-Pacific region is expected to witness the fastest CAGR of 28.8% from 2023 to 2032, and is likely to enhance the market growth during the forecast period. The surge in the usage of mobile data for various applications such as social media and mobile banking contributes to the adoption of fraud detection & prevention solutions in Asia-Pacific.

Image by Markus Spiske from Pixabay

BPFI data shows increase in payment fraud in ireland

Fraudsters stole nearly €85 million (€84.6m) through frauds and scams in Ireland during 2022, an increase of 8.8% on 2021, according to a detailed report published by FraudSMART, the fraud awareness initiative led by Banking & Payments Federation Ireland (BPFI).

The FraudSMART Payment Fraud Report H2 2022 outlines how card fraud accounted for over 95% of fraudulent payment transactions by volume but only 40% of fraud losses at €33.4m.

Most of the increase was driven by online card fraud or ‘card not present’ fraud where a criminal uses the victim’s compromised card information to make an online purchase (up by 24% in value year-on-year to €27.1m in 2022).

The report also highlights the continued rise in value of unauthorised electronic transfers (primarily payments through mobile and online banking) which accounted for almost 39% of fraud losses at €32.8m, but less than 4% of transaction volumes. Meanwhile, there was a 19% decrease in authorised push payment (APP fraud) transactions in 2022 compared to 2021, and APP fraud losses dropped by 41% to €9.9m, the lowest value since the data became available in 2019.

The report comes as FraudSMART warns consumers to be on high alert as text message fraud, known as smishing, continues to become more prevalent. A recent survey by FraudSMART revealed that this type of fraud is now the dominant channel for fraud attempts, with 1 in 2 adults having received fraudulent text message in the previous 12 months. These text messages often include a link and sense of urgency requiring immediate action.

Niamh Davenport, Head of Financial Crime, BPFI said: “[The] figures show that card fraud continues to account for the vast majority of fraudulent payment transactions at 95% of the total volume although these transactions tend to represent lower levels of losses on average. On the other hand, other fraud types have relatively low volumes but would have higher average losses, particularly any fraud that leads to account takeover where the fraudster takes control of your main bank account by tricking you into handing over your bank log in details, which we have seen recently through text message scams.

“Conversely, we also see from today’s report that there was a 19% decrease in authorised push payment (APP fraud) transactions in 2022 compared to 2021. APP fraud can happen when a scammer tricks a consumer into sending money directly from their account to an account which the criminal controls. Examples of this include investment scams such as fake cryptocurrency schemes or romance, holiday or accommodation scams. The decrease in this type of fraud might be attributed to increased consumer awareness or a post-Covid shift, as we have gradually returned to meeting in-person with decreased dependency on online communication. However, figures across all types of financial fraud can fluctuate as fraudsters continually adapt their behaviours and methods.

Image by Picography from Pixabay

HOW TO: Implement anti-fraud measures for digital payments

In today’s digital era, businesses must be vigilant in protecting their payment systems against fraudulent activities. Establishing robust anti-fraud measures is vital to safeguard both your business and your customers. Here are key steps you can take to implement effective anti-fraud measures for digital payments…

The first step is to educate and train your staff. Employees should understand the risks of digital payment fraud and be aware of the latest fraud tactics. Regular training sessions can keep staff updated on best practices for identifying and reporting suspicious activities.

Next, consider implementing multi-factor authentication (MFA). MFA adds an extra layer of security by requiring users to provide at least two forms of verification before a transaction can be approved. This could be something they know (like a password), something they have (like a mobile device), or something they are (a biometric factor).

A key measure is investing in robust encryption technology. Encryption converts payment data into a code that can only be deciphered by those with the correct decryption key. This helps protect sensitive information from being intercepted during transactions.

Investing in fraud detection software that utilises Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is another crucial step. These technologies can analyze vast amounts of transaction data in real time, identifying patterns and anomalies that may signal fraudulent activity. They continuously adapt to new fraud tactics, improving their detection capabilities over time.

You should also consider implementing a secure customer authentication protocol. This could involve behavioral biometrics, which analyzses unique patterns in a user’s behavior, such as keystroke dynamics or mouse movement, to verify their identity.

Employing a firewall and maintaining up-to-date antivirus software is vital. These tools can protect your network and systems from malware or phishing attacks, common tactics used by cybercriminals to steal payment information.

Lastly, develop a robust incident response plan. Despite your best efforts, breaches can still occur. An incident response plan outlines the steps to take in the event of a breach, enabling you to react swiftly to mitigate damage and recover quickly.

Implementing anti-fraud measures for digital payments involves a combination of education, advanced technology, and vigilant practices. The goal is not only to prevent fraud but also to create an environment that fosters trust between your business and your customers.

In an increasingly digital world, safeguarding digital payments is not just a necessity but a responsibility that every business must bear.

Image by Photo Mix from Pixabay

Staying Ahead of the Game: What’s new in payment fraud detection tools and technology

In the fast-paced world of digital payments, fraud detection critical. Cybercriminals are constantly evolving their tactics, necessitating more sophisticated tools and technologies to counter these threats. As the sector continues to evolve, several key trends are emerging in payment fraud detection.

Firstly, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) is transforming fraud detection. AI and ML algorithms can analyse vast amounts of data in real time, identifying patterns and anomalies that may indicate fraudulent activity. They continuously learn and adapt to new fraud tactics, improving their detection capabilities over time. These technologies also allow for predictive analytics, helping to identify potential fraud before it happens.

Secondly, the rise of biometric authentication represents a significant trend. Traditional methods of authentication like passwords and PINs can be stolen or hacked, but biometric data – such as fingerprints, facial patterns, and voice recognition – provide a more secure alternative. The use of biometric authentication in payment processes can greatly enhance fraud detection and prevention.

Another emerging trend is the application of blockchain technology. Blockchain’s decentralised, transparent, and immutable nature makes it a powerful tool for fraud detection. Transactions recorded on a blockchain cannot be altered or deleted, making fraudulent activity easier to trace and harder to execute.

The trend towards multi-factor authentication (MFA) is also gaining momentum. MFA requires users to provide two or more forms of identification before a transaction can be approved. This might include something they know (like a password), something they have (like a mobile device), and something they are (a biometric factor). This layering of security measures significantly reduces the risk of fraud.

Behavioral analytics is another key trend. This technology analyses how a user interacts with a system – their typing speed, mouse movements, device usage patterns, and more. Any deviations from normal behaviour can trigger an alert, helping to identify fraudulent activity.

Lastly, the increasing integration of fraud detection systems is noteworthy. Rather than operating in silos, different fraud detection tools and technologies are being combined into integrated systems. This holistic approach enhances the accuracy and speed of fraud detection, providing a more robust defense against cyber threats.

The trends shaping payment fraud detection reflect a broader shift towards advanced, integrated, and proactive solutions. As these trends continue to evolve, businesses must stay ahead of the curve to protect themselves and their customers from the ever-present threat of fraud.

The ultimate goal remains to build a secure, trustworthy digital payment ecosystem in an increasingly interconnected world.

If you’re on the hunt for fraud detection tools for your business, the Merchant Fraud Summit is here to help!

Image by Sebastian Ganso from Pixabay